Israeli settlements are civilian Jewish communities in the Israeli-occupied territories.[1] Such settlements currently exist in the West Bank and East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.[2][3] The latter two areas are governed under Israeli civil law, but all three territories are considered to be under military occupation by the international community.[4][5][6]
Eighteen settlements formerly existed in the Sinai Peninsula and twenty-one in the Gaza Strip. All of these areas were withdrawn from in 1982 and 2005, respectively.[7]
As of July 2009, approximately 304,569 Israelis live in the 121 officially-recognised settlements in the West Bank, a further 192,000 Israelis live in settlements in East Jerusalem and over 20,000 live in settlements in the Golan Heights.[8][9] Settlements range in their character from farming communities to suburbs to frontier villages, and, in the case of East Jerusalem, city neighborhoods. The three largest settlements, Modi'in Illit, Maale Adumim and Betar Illit, are cities with over 30,000 residents each.
Israeli policies toward these settlements have ranged from active promotion to removal by force, and their continued existence and expansion since the 1970s, and recently through the use of legal loopholes and violations despite a temporary ban on expansion,[10] is thought to be a key issue in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.[11] The ongoing settlement construction by Israel is frequently criticized as an obstacle to the peace process by third parties including the United Kingdom,[12] the European Union,[13] the United Nations[14] and the United States.[14]
The Jewish population in the areas held since 1967 live in a wide variety of centers:
A few of the settlements were established on sites that had been inhabited by Jews during the British Mandate of Palestine.
partial listing only
As of July 2009, approximately 304,569 Israelis live in the 121 officially-recognised settlements in the West Bank, a further 192,000 Israelis live in settlements in East Jerusalem and there are a further 102 unauthorized outposts in the West Bank not officially recognized by Israel.[8][9]
According to various statistics,[21][22][23] the demographics can be estimated as follows:
Jewish population | 1948 | 1966 | 1972 | 1983 | 1993 | 2004 | 2007 | 2009 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
West Bank (excluding Jerusalem) | 480 (see Gush Etzion) | 0 | 1,182 | 22,800 | 111,600 | 234,487 | 276,462[24] | 304,569[8] |
Gaza Strip | 30 (see Kfar Darom) | 0 | 700 1 | 900 | 4,800 | 7,826 | 0 | 0 |
Golan Heights | 0 | 0 | 77 | 6,800 | 12,600 | 17,265 | 18,692 | 20,000 |
East Jerusalem | 2,300 (see Jewish Quarter, Atarot, Neve Yaakov) | 0 | 8,649 | 76,095 | 152,800 | 181,587 | 189,708 | 192,000 |
Total | 2,810 | 0 | 10,608 1 | 106,595 | 281,800 | 441,165 | 484,862 | 516,569 |
In addition to internal migration, in large though declining numbers, the settlements absorb annually about 1000 new immigrants from outside Israel. In the '90s, the annual settler population growth was more than three times the annual population growth in Israel.[25] In the '00s, the large settler population growth continues.[26] The population of settlements in the West Bank has been growing at a rate of 5-6% since 2001.[9]
According to the NGOs B'Tselem and Peace Now, the Israeli government has implemented a consistent and systematic policy intended to encourage Jewish citizens to migrate to the West Bank. One of the tools used to this end is to grant financial benefits and incentives to citizens.[27][28]
As of 2009, the total number of Israeli settlers was 516,569. This figure includes settlers in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights.[8]
The Golan Heights is administered under Israeli civil law as the Golan sub-district, a part of the Northern District. As the residents of pre-1967 communities in the Golan Heights (mainly Druze) are Israeli citizens, Israel makes no legal or administrative distinction between these communities and the post-1967 settlements.
East Jerusalem is defined in the Jerusalem Law as part of Israel's capital, Jerusalem. As such it is administered as part of the city and its district, the Jerusalem District. Pre-1967 residents of East Jerusalem and their descendants have residency status in the city but are mostly not citizens of Israel. Thus, the Israeli government maintains an administrative distinction between Israeli citizens and non-citizens in East Jerusalem, but the Jerusalem municipality does not.
Settlements in the West Bank are encompassed in the Judea and Samaria District. Authority for planning and construction in the district is held by the Israel Defense Forces Civil Administration. Since Israeli civil law does not apply to the West Bank, settlers in the area are theoretically subject to martial law. In practice, however, settlers are generally judged in civil courts within Israel proper. The district consists of four cities, thirteen local councils and six regional councils.
The Yesha Council is an umbrella organization of municipal councils in the Judea and Samaria district. (Yesha is a Hebrew acronym for Judea, Samaria and Gaza, which was coined when there were Israeli settlements in the Gaza strip.)
The major Israeli institution of higher education in the West Bank is the Ariel University Center of Samaria (formerly The College of Judea and Samaria), Israel's largest public college. The college was accredited in 1994 and awards bachelor degrees in arts, sciences, technology, architecture and physical therapy.[29]
Teacher training colleges in West Bank settlements include Herzog College in Alon Shevut and Orot Israel College in Elkana. The Golan Heights boasts Ohalo College, located in Katzrin.[29]
Curricula at Israeli academic institutions in the West Bank are overseen by the Council for Higher Education in Judea and Samaria (CHE-JS).[30]
Due to high unemployment rates in the West Bank, tens of thousands of West Bank Palestinians depend on jobs in the settlements. In 2010 Palestinian leaders announced a ban prohibiting Palestinian laborers from working in Israeli settlements. The ban has triggered anger and uncertainty among West Bank Palestinians who depend on employment in the settlements.[31] Labour leaders have warned the Palestinian government against taking any legal steps against those who continue to work in the settlements. The prospect of losing Palestinian labour at the end of 2010 has forced farms run by settlers in the Jordan valley to draw up plans to bring in more workers from East Asia. Israeli observers say it will not undermine the economic viability of the settlements. "Economically speaking, it is negligable," said Amotz Ass-El, a Jerusalem Post columist.[32]
Palestinian officials estimate that settlers sell goods worth some $500 million into the Palestinian market.[32]
The UK Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has suggested that products produced by the settlements for sale in UK markets be labeled as such.[33]
Palestinians argue that the policy of settlements constitutes an effort to pre-empt or even sabotage a peace treaty that includes Palestinian sovereignty, and claim that the presence of settlements harm the ability to have a viable and contiguous state.[34][35]
The Israel Foreign Ministry asserts that some settlements are legitimate, as they took shape when there was no operative diplomatic arrangement, and thus they did not violate any agreement.[36][37][38] Based on this, they assert the following specific reasons for accepting settlements as legitimate:
Israel has justified its civilian settlements by stating that a temporary use of land and buildings for various purposes appears permissible under a plea of military necessity and that the settlements fulfilled security needs.[45] In 1967, Theodor Meron, legal counsel to the Israeli Foreign Ministry stated in a legal opinion to Adi Yafeh, the Political Secretary of the Prime Minister, "My conclusion is that civilian settlement in the administered territories contravenes the explicit provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention."[46] The legal opinion, forwarded to Levi Eshkol, was not made public at the time, and the Labor cabinet progressively sanctioned settlements anyway; this action paved the way for future settlement growth. In 2007, Judge Meron stated that "I believe that I would have given the same opinion today."[47] Nevertheless, Israel considers its settlement policy to be consistent with international law, including the Fourth Geneva Convention, while recognizing that some of the smaller settlements have been constructed "illegally" in the sense of being in violation of Israeli law.[48] In 1998 the Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs produced "The International Criminal Court Background Paper".[49] It concludes
International law has long recognised that there are crimes of such severity they should be considered "international crimes". Such crimes have been established in treaties such as the Genocide Convention and the Geneva Conventions. .... The following are Israel's primary issues of concern [ie with the rules of the ICC]: - The inclusion of settlement activity as a "war crime" is a cynical attempt to abuse the Court for political ends. The implication that the transfer of civilian population to occupied territories can be classified as a crime equal in gravity to attacks on civilian population centres or mass murder is preposterous and has no basis in international law.
The consensus view of the international community is that the building of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights is illegal under international law, although Israel disputes this.[50][51][52][53]
Article 3 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination[54] says "States Parties particularly condemn racial segregation and apartheid and undertake to prevent, prohibit and eradicate all practices of this nature in territories under their jurisdiction." A review of Israel's country report by the experts of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination took issue with the establishment of Jewish-only settlements and stated "The status of the settlements was clearly inconsistent with Article 3 of the Convention which, as noted in the Committee's General Recommendation XIX, prohibited all forms of racial segregation in all countries. There was a consensus among publicists that the prohibition of racial discrimination, irrespective of territories, was an imperative norm of international law.[55] The primary judicial organ of the UN, the International Court of Justice, found the settlements to be illegal under international law.[56] The Court's finding was based on the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention and UN Security council resolutions, which condemned establishment of settlements and attempts by Israel to alter the demographics of the territories under its control, including resolutions 446, 452, 465, 471, and 476, which find the settlements to be illegal.[57]
International intergovernmental organizations such as the Conference of the High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention,[58] every major organ of the United Nations,[59] the European Union, and Canada,[60] have declared that the settlements are a violation of international law. A review of Israel's country report conducted by the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination stated "The status of the settlements was clearly inconsistent with Article 3 of the Convention, which, as noted in the Committee's General Recommendation XIX, prohibited all forms of racial segregation in all countries. There is a consensus among publicists that the prohibition of racial discrimination, irrespective of territories, is an imperative norm of international law."[61] Non-governmental organizations including Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch have also characterized the settlements as a violation of international law. In 1978, the Legal Adviser of the Department of State to the United States Congress concluded that "the establishment of the civilian settlements in those territories is inconsistent with international law."[62][63] Israel, the Anti-Defamation League and some prominent legal scholars disagree.[64][65][66] Under Israeli law, West Bank settlements must meet specific criteria to be legal; Approximately 100[9] unauthorized small communities that do not meet these criteria exist and are called illegal outposts.[63][67][68][69]
The International Court of Justice concluded that Israel had breached its obligations under international law by establishing settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and that Israel cannot rely on a right of self-defence or on a state of necessity to preclude the wrongfulness of imposing a régime that is contrary to international law. The Court also concluded that the Israeli régime violates the basic human rights of the Palestinians by impeding the liberty of movement of the inhabitants of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (with the exception of lsraeli citizens) and their exercise of the right to work, to health, to education and to an adequate standard of living.[70]
Human rights organisation Amnesty International argues that Israel's settlement policy is not only illegal, but is discriminatory and a violation of Palestinian human rights.[71] The Israeli human rights centre B'Tselem has highlighted the impact on Palestinian freedom of movement due to Israeli travel restrictions. In Hebron especially, "grave violations" of Palestinian human rights have occurred due to "the presence of the settlers within the city."[72][73][74] They claim that more than fifty percent of West Bank land has been expropriated from Palestinian owners "mainly to establish settlements and create reserves of land for the future expansion of the settlements". While the seized lands mainly benefit the settlements, the Palestinian public is prohibited from using them in any way.[75] They also regard some of the roads established by Israel throughout the West Bank that are closed to vehicles with Palestinian license-plates as 'discriminatory'.[76]
Human Rights Watch reports on "settler violence," which refers to the phenomenon of violence, such as stoning and shooting, committed by Israeli settlers against Israeli security forces and Palestinians who live in the Palestinian territories.[77] In recent years Israeli withdrawals from Gaza and Hebron have triggered settler rioting in protest. There is also continual conflict between settlers and Palestinians over land, resources and perceived grievances.
According to B'Tselem, more than fifty percent of the land of the West Bank has been expropriated from Palestinian owners "mainly to establish settlements and create reserves of land for the future expansion of the settlements". While the seized lands mainly benefit the settlements, the Palestinian public is prohibited from using them in any way.[75]
Meron Benvenisti opined in Haaretz,
'the entire "settlement enterprise" has become a commercial real estate project, which conscripts Zionist rhetoric for profit'.[78]
The recent construction of the Israeli West Bank barrier routed inside the green line to encompass a variety of settlements has also been cited as an infirengement on Palestinian human and land rights. The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs estimates that 10% of the West Bank will fall on the Israeli side of the barrier.[79][80]
According to Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, 63% of Palestinians oppose efforts made by the Palestinian National Authority to criminalize Palestinians from working in the settlements. However, 72% of Palestinians support a boycott of the sale of the communities products.[81]
Human rights organisation Amnesty International argues that Israel's settlement policy is not only illegal, but is discriminatory and a violation of Palestinian human rights.[71] The Israeli human rights centre B'Tselem has highlighted the impact on Palestinian freedom of movement due to Israeli travel restrictions. Travel restrictions imposed on Palestinians have been compared to South Africa's apartheid regime.[82] In Hebron especially, "grave violations" of Palestinian human rights have occurred due to "the presence of the settlers within the city."[72][73][74]
Palestinians have been highly involved in the construction business since the settlements first started appearing in the West Bank. The Palestinian Authority estimates over 12,000 Palestinians are employed by Jewish and Arab contractors in building and expanding settlements. It is reported that even supporters of Hamas and Islamic Jihad work in the settlement business. A lack of jobs and relatively high salary has been cited as a motivation for Palestinian involvement. Arab workers are said to be paid approximately 3 times as much by Israeli contractors than Palestinian employers. Jewish employers pay an average of NIS 400 ($100 US$) while Palestinian contractors pay NIS 100 to NIS 150 per day.[83]
According to a 2008 annual report by Kav LaOved, many Palestinians who work in Israeli settlements are not given the same basic protections that apply to Israeli workers under Israeli labor law such as a minimum wage, payment for working overtime, work safety and other social rights. Instead, many Israeli employers in the West Bank treat Palestinian workers according to Jordanian labor law, which is much more "lax" than Israeli law. Jordanian law does not require minimum wage, payment for working overtime and other social rights. This system was legally challenged in 2007 by Kav LaOved and reached the Israeli Supreme Court, which ruled that Israeli labor law does apply to Palestinians working in West Bank settlements. The court ruled that applying different rules in the same work place based on differing nationalities constituted as discrimination and was unacceptable. In spite of the ruling, Kav LaOved believes the law will not be enforced as only a few workers have gained rights that they are legally entitled to. The ruling has however allowed Palestinian workers to file lawsuits in Israeli courts, which has led to an average settlement of "100,000 shekels."[84] Israeli human rights group B'Tselem has expressed similar concern for the conditions of Palestinian workers in the West Bank.[85]
Although the vast majority of West Bank settlers are law abiding, there is a rise in violent acts by extremist settlers against IDF troops and neighboring Palestinians.[86] As of 2008, the number of Jewish settlers involved in violent acts is estimated to be a few hundreds, out of a total population of about 500,000.[87] A UN report recorded 222 acts of settler violence against Palestinians and IDF troops in the first half of 2008 compared with 291 in 2007.[87] Prominent Jewish religious figures living in the occupied territories, as well as Israeli government officials, have condemned and expressed outrage over incidents of such behaviour.[88] In the years 2008-2009, the defense establishment has began taking a harder line against unruly settlers.[86] Some extremist settlers are using a tactic called Price Tagging, 'punishing' Palestinian population whenever the Government sends police or soldiers to dismantle an illegal outpost.[89]
The violence by some settlers against Palestinians has been harshly condemned by some of the leading religious figures in the West Bank, including Rabbi Menachem Fruman of Tekoa, who said:
"Targeting Palestinians and their property is a shocking thing, (...) It's an act of hurting humanity. (...) This builds a wall of fire between Jews and Arabs."[88]
The umbrella organization of municipal councils of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, Yesha Council and former Knesset member and settler Hanan Porat has also condemned violence against Palestinians.[90]
In response to the settler violence towards Israeli security forces, Israel declared it would no longer fund any illegal outposts from November, 2008.[91]
Israeli human rights group B'Tselem says that the violence is "a means to harass and intimidate Palestinians" and that the evacuations are a necessary part of the peace process. According to B'Tselem that when a building is evacuated by the Israeli government, settlers lash out at Palestinians because they're "easy victims" and as a means to widen the area under settler control.[92] B'Tselem says Israeli authorities "employ an undeclared policy of leniency and compromise" toward settlers who commit violent crime against Palestinians.[93] The United Nations says that Israeli security forces fail to intervene in settler attacks and arrest settlers suspected of violence.[94]
Unlike Palestinians, Israeli civilians living in the Palestinian Territories are not subject to military or local law, but are prosecuted according to Israeli penal law.[95] Haaretz has stated "Israeli society has become accustomed to giving lawbreaking settlers special treatment", noting that no other group could similarly attack Israeli law enforcement agencies without being severely punished.[96]
Olive farming is a major industry and employer in the Palestinian West Bank and olive trees are a common target of settler violence, with over 10.000 olive trees destroyed by settlers in 2007-2010.[97][98]
There were a number of extremist groups associated with the settler movement. Gush Emunim Underground was a terrorist organization linked to the settler activist group Gush Emunim that existed from 1979–1984. They carried out attacks against Jewish students and Palestinian officials, attempted to bomb a bus and planned an attack on the Dome on the Rock.[99][100]
The Palestinian leadership has accused Israel of "encouraging and enabling" settler violence in a bid to provoke Palestinian riots and violence in retaliation.[101]
Between 2000-2010, 242 Israeli civilians were killed by Palestinians in settlements in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, while 47 Palestinians were killed by Israeli civilians in those areas, a significant portion of which were killed while attempting to infiltrate settlements or attacking Israelis.[102][103]
Years | Israeli civilian | Palestinian |
---|---|---|
1987 | 0 | 0 |
1988 | 6 | 15 |
1989 | 3 | 17 |
1990 | 4 | 9 |
1991 | 7 | 6 |
1992 | 11 | 2 |
1993 | 27 | 13 |
1994 | 11 | 38 |
1995 | 7 | 2 |
1996 | 3 | 3 |
1997 | 4 | 4 |
1998 | 8 | 6 |
1999 | 1 | 0 |
2000 | 20 | 6 |
2001 | 65 | 7 |
2002 | 87 | 13 |
2003 | 25 | 6 |
2004 | 15 | 2 |
2005 | 17 | 7 |
2006 | 7 | 0 |
2007 | 2 | 0 |
2008 | 3 | 4 |
2009 | 2 | 1 |
2010 | 5 | 1 |
1987–2010 | 340 | 162 |
Since mid-1990s attacks against settlers became a frequent phenomenon. Settlers are mostly targeted by Palestinian armed groups such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad, whose representatives argue that the settlers have forfeited their civilian status because they reside in illegal settlements.[109] Human rights group B'tselem rejected this reasoning, and stated:
"The illegality of the settlements has no effect at all on the status of their civilian residents. The settlers constitute a distinctly civilian population, which is entitled to all the protections granted civilians by international law. The Israeli security forces' use of land in the settlements or the membership of some settlers in the Israeli security forces does not affect the status of the other residents living among them, and certainly does not make them proper targets of attack. B'Tselem strongly opposes the attempts to justify attacks against Israeli civilians by using distorted interpretations of international law. Furthermore, B'Tselem demands that the Palestinian Authority do everything within its power to prevent future attacks and to prosecute the individuals involved in past attacks."[110]
The human rights organization Human Rights Watch also issued a similar statement.[109]
Types of fatal attacks by Palestinians militants against settlers have included firing of rockets and mortars, shootings, amongst other methods. Children have sometimes been victims in these attacks. Incidents that received relative notoreity include two 14-year-old boys from the settlement of Tekoa who were found dead in a nearby cave.
Major incidents of violences against Israeli settlers or in settlements include the Murder of Shalhevet Pass, a ten-month-old Israeli infant who shot by a Palestinian sniper on the streets of Hebron.[111] and Murder of Koby Mandell, an Israeli-American child, on May 8, 2001, by Palestinian militants near Tekoa.[112]
There have also been incidents such as the Bat Ayin ax attack where a Palestinian attacked children in the settlement of Bat Ayin with an axe and a knife, killing 13-year-old boy and seriously wounding another,[113] and the Killing of Rabbi Meir Hai who was killed in a drive-by shooting.[114][115]
International and local left-wing, anarchist and pro-Palestinian activists frequently demonstrate near settlements. There have been recorded cases of them stone-throwing and physical attacks as well as provocations within the settlements.
It has been claimed that they sometimes record only the settler response on film in order to publicize it in the media as evidence of settler violence.[116][117][118] In 2008, Commander Avshalom Peled, head of the Israel Police's Hebron district, described "left-wing" activity in the city as dangerous and provocative. He claimed that the "leftists" liked to antagonize the settlers in hope of getting a reaction. He called organizations like Bnei Avraham and Breaking the Silence as wolves in sheep's clothing.[119]
In April 2010, a group of activists broke into Otniel on the Jewish holy day of Shabbat and made a provocation when one of their women stripped to the waist and began to play a flute while topless. The activists resisted the requests of the local action squad and Israeli soldiers who needed to wait for police to arrive to arrest the group.[120][121]
The Municipal Environmental Associations of Judea and Samaria was set up by settler councils to promote environmental awareness in the West Bank. Their stated goals include a commitment to find solutions to sewage treatment problems and to work with the Palestinian Authority on environmental issues.[122]
While Israeli settlers account for 10% of the population in the West Bank, they are responsible for approximately 25% of all sewage according to a study by Haaretz. Residents of Beit Duqqu and Qalqilyah have accused settlers of polluting their farmland for the past 15 years. Villagers claim children have become ill after swimming in a local stream polluted with sewage by settlement Givat Zeev. Legal action has been taken against 14 colonies by the Israeli Ministry of the Environment but enforcement is problematic due to difficulties by the Israeli administration in the West Bank. Some Israeli settlers have criticized Palestinians on "their own environmental record". The Palestinian Authority has reportedly been targeted by environmentalists for not doing more to prevent water pollution.[122][123]
Settlers and Palestinians share the mountain aquifer as a water source, and both generate sewage and industrial effluents that endanger the aquifer. A 2004 report by Friends of the Earth Middle East said that inadequate sewage treatment existed among Palestinians and settlers. Sewage from Palestinian sources was estimated at 46 million cubic meters a year, and sources from settler sources are 15 million cubic meters a year. The report concluded that sewage from many settlements received unsatisfactory treatment, while sewage from Palestinian villages was disposed in unlined cesspits with no treatment at all, and sewage from Palestinian cities was generally discharged without treatment into streams or the open environment.[122][124]
According to a 2007 study conducted by the Israel Nature and Parks Authority and the Israeli Ministry of Environmental Protection, Palestinian towns and cities produce an estimated 56 million cubic meters of sewage per year, 94 percent of which is discharged without adequate treatment, while Israeli sources produce an estimated 17.5 million cubic meters per year, 31.5 percent of which is discharged without adequate treatment.[125]
Settlers also operate industrial and manufacturing businesses that can create pollution as many do not conform to Israeli standards according to Palestinian environmentalists.[122][123] Abu Shusha, a former Palestinian quarry located between Kedumim and Nablus in the West Bank is to be converted to an industrial waste dump that will receive 10,000 metric tons each month from Israel. Pollution experts warn that the dump will threaten Palestinian water sources.[126]
The settlements have on several occasions been a source of tension between Israel and the U.S.. President Jimmy Carter insisted that the settlements were illegal and unwise tactically, and decades after leaving office he wrote Palestine Peace Not Apartheid. President Ronald Reagan stated that they were legal, though he considered them an obstacle to negotiations.[65] In 1991 there was a clash between the Bush administration and Israel, where the U.S. delayed a subsidized loan to pressure Israel not to proceed with the establishment of settlements for instance in the Jerusalem-Bethlehem corridor. In 2005 the United States ambassador to Israel, Dan Kurtzer, expressed U.S. support "for the retention by Israel of major Israeli population centres [in the West Bank] as an outcome of negotiations",[127] reflecting President Bush's statement a year earlier that a permanent peace treaty would have to reflect "demographic realities" in the West Bank.[128] In June 2009, President Barack Obama said "The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements."[129]
Although the Oslo accords did not include any obligation on Israel's part to stop building in the "settlements", Palestinians argue that Israel has undermined the Oslo accords, and the peace process more generally, by continuing to expand the settlements after the signing of the Accords. Israel previously also had settlements in the Sinai Peninsula, but these were forcibly evacuated and destroyed as a result of the peace agreement with Egypt. Many have noted the role of private U.S. corporations and charities in funding these settlements, and the tax breaks they enjoy from the government on these 'donations.'For more information, see the article "Time to Crack down on Settlement Funding," an article published by [The Jerusalem Fund] in Washington, DC [15]
Most Israeli and U.S. proposals for final agreement have also involved Israel being allowed to retain long established communities in the territories near Israel and in East Jerusalem (the majority of the settler population is near the "Green Line"), with Israel annexing the land where the communities are located. This would result in a transfer of roughly 5% of the West Bank to Israel, with the Palestinians being compensated by the transfer of a similar share of Israeli territory (i.e. territory behind the "Green Line") to the Palestinian state. Palestinians complain that this would legitimize what they see as an illegitimate land grab, and that the land offered in exchange is situated in the southern desert, whereas the areas that Israel seeks to retain are among the West Bank's most fertile areas, including major aquifers. Israel, however, sees the current "Green Line" as unacceptable from a security standpoint - Israel would have at some points no more than 17 kilometers from the border to the sea. For more details, see Proposals for a Palestinian state.
Former President George Bush has stated that he does not expect Israel to return entirely to pre-1967 borders, due to "new realities on the ground."[130] One of the main compromise plans put forth by the Clinton Administration would have allowed Israel to keep some settlements in the West Bank, especially those in large blocs near the pre-1967 borders of Israel. in return, Palestinians would have received some concessions of land in other parts of the country.[131]
Both U.S. President Bill Clinton and U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair, who played notable roles in attempts at mediation, noted the need for some territorial and diplomatic compromise on this issue, based on the validity of some of the claims of both sides.[132][133]
Fayed Mustafa, Palestinian ambassador to Russia, has called on the return of Palestinian territories to Egypt and Jordon if the current talks fail.[134]
Israeli defense Minister Ehud Barak has approved a plan that would require security commitments in exchange for a withdraw from the West Bank.[135] Barak has also expressed readiness to cede parts of East Jerusalem to the Palestinians and put the holy sites in the city under a "special regime".[136]
On 6 September 2010, Jordanian King Abdullah II and Syrian President Bashar Assad said that Israel would need to withdraw from all of the lands occupied in 1967 in order to achieve peace with the Palestinians.[137]
The Clinton Parameters included a plan on which the Palestinian State was to include 94-96% of the West Bank, and around 80% of the settlers were to remain under Israeli sovereignty, and in exchange for that, Israel will concede some territory (so called 'Territory Exchange' or 'Land Swap') within the Green Line (1967 borders). The swap would consist of 1-3% of Israeli territory, such that the final borders of the West Bank part of the Palestinian state would include 97% of the land of the original borders.[138]
In 2010, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said that the Palestinians and Israel have agreed on the principle of a land swap. The issue of the ratio of land Israel would give to the Palestinians in exchange for keeping settlement blocs is an issue of dispute, with the Palestinians demanding that the ratio be 1:1, and Israel offering less.[139]
A number of proposals for the granting of Palestinian citizenship or residential permits to Jewish settlers in return for the removal of Israeli military installations from the West Bank have been fielded by such individuals[140] as Arafat,[141] Ibrahim Sarsur[142] and Ahmed Qureia.[143] According to Rabbi Yehoshua Magnes, the possibility that any such exchange of sovereignty over the Jewish settler population can occur without subsequent Arab reprisal violence is low.[144]
Israeli Minister Moshe Ya'alon said in April 2010 that "just as Arabs live in Israel, so, too, should Jews be able to live in Palestine." ... "If we are talking about coexistence and peace, why the [Palestinian] insistence that the territory they receive be ethnically cleansed of Jews?".[145]
Given the dispute over the territories where the settlements were built, the issue of dismantling them has been considered. Arab parties to the conflict have demanded the dismantlement of the settlements as a condition for peace with Israel. As part of the Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty, Israel was required to evacuate its settlers from the 18 Sinai settlements. The evacuation, which took place in 1982, was done forcefully in some instances, such as the evacuation of Yamit. The settlements were demolished, as it was feared that settlers might try to return to their homes after the evacuation.
During the peace process with the Palestinians, the issue of dismantling the West Bank and Gaza Strip settlements has been raised.
As part of the Disengagement Plan, Israel has evacuated the Gaza Strip and part of the West Bank, including all 21 settlements in Gaza and four in the West Bank, while retaining control over Gaza's borders, coastline, and airspace. Most of these settlements have existed since the early 80's, some are over 30 years old, and with a total population of more than 10,000, many of whom have yet to find permanent housing. There was significant opposition to the plan among parts of the Israeli public, and especially those living in the territories. American President George W. Bush has said that a permanent peace deal would have to reflect "demographic realities" in the West Bank regarding Israel's settlements.[146]
Within the former settlements, almost all buildings were demolished by Israel, with the exception of certain government and religious structures, which were completely emptied. Under an international arrangement, productive greenhouses were left to assist the Palestinian economy but these were destroyed within hours by Palestinian looters.[147] Following the withdrawal, many of the former synagogues were torched and destroyed by Palestinians.[148] The Palestinian leadership "maintained" that the synagogues were "symbols of Israeli occupation." Kofi Annan, the Secretary-General of the United Nations at the time, said the Palestinian Authority had a "moral responsibility to protect the synagogues as places with religious significance."[149]
Some Israelis believe the settlements need not necessarily be dismantled and evacuated, even if Israel withdraws from the territory where they stand, as they can remain under Palestinian rule. These ideas have been expressed both by people from the left,[150] who see this as a possible situation in a two-state solution, and by extreme right-wingers and settlers[151] that, while objecting to any withdrawal, claim stronger links to the land than to the state of Israel.
A July 2009 survey of Israeli public opinion found that people are about evenly divided on the issue, with 46 percent of those polled in support of further construction and 44 percent opposed.[152]
Israel captured the Sinai Peninsula from Egypt in the 1967 Six Day War. It established settlements along the Gulf of Aqaba and in the northeast portion, just below the Gaza Strip. It had plans to expand the settlement of Yamit into a city with a population of 200,000,[153] though the actual population of Yamit did not exceeded 3,000.[154] The Sinai Peninsula was returned to Egypt in stages beginning in 1979 as part of the Israel–Egypt Peace Treaty. As required by the treaty, Israel had to evacuate Israeli military installations and civilian settlements. Israel dismantled eighteen settlements, two air force bases, a naval base, and other installations by 1982, including the only oil resources under Israeli control. The evacuation of the civilian population, which took place in 1982, was done forcefully in some instances, such as the evacuation of Yamit. The settlements were demolished, as it was feared that settlers might try to return to their homes after the evacuation.
Since 1982, the Sinai Peninsula has not been regarded as occupied territory.
In January 2009, Israeli political activist group Peace Now stated that settlement construction rose by 60 percent from 2007 to 2008.[155] A classified Israel Defense Forces study allegedly leaked to the Israeli media that month reported that 3 out of every 4 settlement building projects did not have proper permits.[156] Israel-based Palestinian solidarity group Yesh Din argued that the report described Israelis "systematically violating international law and the property rights of Palestinian residents".[156] The Israeli government has not commented on the authenticity of the report.[156] The New York Times has published a Google Maps-based adaptation of the data.
President Barack Obama and his special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, both support taking down the settlements.[157] In January 2009, Kadima Chairwoman Tzipi Livni vowed to dismantle them should her party win in the that month's election.[158] Likud Chairman Benjamin Netanyahu planned to expand them, saying specifically that "I have no intention of building new settlements in the West Bank... But like all the governments there have been until now, I will have to meet the needs of natural growth in the population. I will not be able to choke the settlements."[157]
On 15 October 2009, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that he had ended talks with the Americans over the settlements.[159]
Operation Price Tag is a coordinated tactic adapted by the Israeli settlers movement of attacking Palestinian property in retaliation for attempts by the Israeli government efforts to remove illegal West Bank outposts. Several hundred, mostly young Israeli settlers, are involved. Israeli security forces, the Israeli Defense Force, IDF, are poorly equipped to deal with the outbreak.[160] The Israeli government has responded with a plan to increase law enforcement and cut off aid to illegal outposts.[161]
|
|